In 1938, Winston Churchill
wrote "While England Slept," his famous warning to the British people
that they must wake up and strengthen their resolve and resources to resist the
Nazi tyranny that was ominously gathering strength on the European mainland.Churchill's warning was heeded barely in the
nick of time, and had the English languished in their comfortable lethargy just
a little longer, their nation might have fallen to Hitler's relentless march to
conquest before the Brits were armed and prepared for the challenge.
A comparable national lethargy seems to have anesthetized
much of the American populace as it becomes increasingly vulnerable to a
tyranny of a different sort.This threat
is not posed by the militaristic totalitarians of another nation, but by the
domestic tyrants who are asserting an increasingly totalitarian form of
political control over the United States.
America Slumbers, while Obama lurches towards tyranny
Our constitutional Republic is not threatened by external forces,
but by insidious domestic political abuse and aggrandizement, thus far
unhindered by any vigilant patriotic resistance.Unless enough right-minded Americans stir
themselves from their political slumber, President Obama's ongoing subversion
of constitutional government in American could become a fait accompli.
Obama is engaged in an increasingly blatant expansion of
presidential lawmaking and law-breaking power that brazenly flouts the
constitutional restrictions so carefully established by the Founding
Fathers.Although other presidents have
sometimes pushed the envelope of their authorityat the margins, Obama is engaging in the most extreme and
ruthless expansions of executive power since the exigencies of the Civil War
drove Lincoln to resort to harsh measures (like the suspension of habeas corpus
in 1861) he considered absolutely necessary to save the Union .But no such exigencies remotely justify
Obama's calculated flouting of constitutional restraints on his politicized
power-grab.
The constitutional rules governing the exercise of the
presidential authority are straightforward – and this reckless president
violates them directly and regularly.Under Article I of the Constitution, the legislative authority –
specifically, "all legislative
powers" -- is granted solely to Congress, and it must be exercised in a specifically
prescribed manner.The laws must be
passed by both the Senate and the House of Representatives, and signed by the
President – unless his rejection of a bill is overridden by a two-thirds
majority of both Houses.Further, Under
Article II, section 3, of the Constitution, the President is required to
"take care that the laws be faithfully executed."
Obama is usurping and subverting this legislative
authority both by purporting to impose laws that have not been enacted by Congress, and by declining to enforce laws that
have been enacted.
Under Art. II, the President exercises the executive
power, which is chiefly the authority to execute or administer the laws, as
written, and to act as Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces.It does not include any direct authority to
make laws.The President does, however,
have limited authority to promulgate regulations that are necessary to
implement laws passed by Congress.And
he has authority to promulgate executive orders insofar as they implement
executive authority he already possesses, either directly under the
Constitution, or by legislative delegation from Congress.For example, the President can issue
executive orders regulating certain military matters based on his clear
authority as Commander-in-Chief.Conversely, the President cannot
constitutionally issue orders categorically declining to enforce duly enacted
laws, or imposing requirements or standards on people or companies that have
not been enacted or authorized by legislation.
But Obama routinely and repeatedly engages in precisely
those forms of patently unconstitutional tyranny.For example, he has impudently refused to
enforce the immigration laws against entire categories of illegal aliens, without
any constitutional or statutory basis to do so.Sycophantic legal "scholars" strain to excuse this
unconstitutional behavior by invoking the amorphous doctrine of prosecutorial
discretion, which merely states the truism that it is impossible to prosecute all violations of the law, and therefore
the government must have some discretion to focus its prosecutorial efforts in
the most effective manner.But that is not what Obama and his minions are
doing.Instead, they are categorically exempting certain preferred
groups from enforcement of the law, exactly as though Congress had enacted such
a categorical exemption in the relevant statute -- even though Congress
actually declined to enact such an exemption.This is the essence of tyrannical usurpation of the legislative
authority – usurpation that makes a mockery of a constitutional republic.
Obama and his lawless Attorney General, Eric Holder,
similarly declined to enforce the Defense of Marriage Act ("DOMA")
because of their fanatical determination to impose same-sex marriage on the
Nation.More recently, Obama has
selectively ordered the Secretary of HHS and other federal officials to cease
enforcement of mandatory provisions of the so-called Affordable Care Act (ACA),
aka Obamacare, because Obama's political designs required it.Obama has thus made it clear that he has no
respect or regard for the Constitution's directive that he "take
care" to faithfully execute the laws.
Again and again, moreover, the Obama administration effectively amends
duly enacted statutes by executive action, when such amendment can only be done
by corrective legislation in accordance with Art.I of the Constitution.
Rather than recognizing that he may have pushed
too far in this regard, Obama has recently made clear that he actually intends
to "double down" with such practices. His arrogance is such that he utterly fails to
recognize the legitimacy of legislative opposition – exactly as contemplated by
the Framers as a necessary check against tyranny – and invokes such opposition as
justification for unilateral, and unconstitutional presidential lawmaking.
On top of his illegitimate presidential legislating,
Obama has extended his constitutional abuses to the appointment power which he
possesses under Art II, sec. 2 of the Constitution.The President's appointment of
"principal officers" – like the Heads of Departments or the members
of certain boards and agencies – expressly requires the confirmation of two-thirds of the
Senate.An exception to this requirement
exists when the Senate is in recess, during which recess the President may make
appointments of limited duration without such Senate confirmation.But Obama has brazenly distorted this
provision by purporting to usurp the Senate's sole authority under Art. I, sec.
5 of the Constitution, to declare when it is in recess.In 2012, when the Senate formally declared
that it was still in session and not
in recess, Obama brazenly rejected the Senate's declaration, decided for
himself that the Senate was in
recess, and proceeded to appoint important federal officers without Senate
confirmation.Three federal courts of
appeals have since ruled that these appointments were unconstitutional, and the
Supreme Court's consideration of the issue at oral argument several weeks ago
strongly indicates that it will reach the same conclusion.Whether a reprimand from the Supreme Court on
this particular constitutional abuse will substantially curtail Obama's relentless
quest for unhindered executive power is doubtful.
We have now reached the point where the danger posed by
Obama's gross disregard for constitutional constraints is not a matter of mere academic or
journalistic debate.It is real.Obama is an anti-constitutional tyrant bent
on gathering as much power as possible into his radical leftist hands.
In the absence of a determined political opposition
in Congress with sufficient voting power and unity to provide a meaningful
check, Obama's relentless reach for unfettered presidential power will continue
unabated.Only if Republicans are able
to achieve majority control in the Senate in the 2014 elections, while retaining
their control in the House, will such a meaningful check be achieved – and even
then, only if the Republican majorities are as unified in their opposition as
congressional Democrats are unified in their sycophantic support.
Regretably, Obama's above-described effort to nullify
the restraints inherent in the separation of powers is hardly the only example
of tyrannical and anti-constitutional abuse perpetrated by Obama and his
administration minions.In subsequent
posts, SR will examine how Obama and his dangerous Attorney General, Eric Holder,
have grotesquely distorted the constitutional requirement of equal protection
under the laws to benefit their favored political constituencies, such as certain
blacks, Hispanics, and homosexuals, to the detriment of the citizenry at large.SR will also consider the Obama
administration's blatant abuse of its law enforcement power to punish political
enemies, while protecting favored political constituencies – the very essence
of tyrannical government.
For too many
years, U.S. foreign policy has been excessively preoccupied with the internal
and external crises and fiascos of the Mid-eastern and Muslim nations.Although the calamitous terrorist attacks of
September 11, 2001, understandably focused U.S. concerns upon the defeat and
deterrence of al Qaeda and other Mid-eastern terrorists, the obsessive
preoccupation with issues in that area of the world has been unnecessarily
prolonged.
Such diplomatic myopia is especially
misplaced in light of ominous recent developments
in other parts of the world -- developments involving nations of far greater
size, population, power, and significance than the largely backward
Muslim-dominated states of the Mid-East.
Like the fictional Smaug in his
cave, the mighty Chinese Dragon is stirring and spreading its military wings,
with ominous implications for peace and stability in its regional neighborhood.A justifiably alarmed Japan looks to its
defenses, finds them woefully inadequate, and contemplates strengthening its
military posture to a degree that China is likely to find
counter-provocative -- raising the prospect of a dangerously escalating game of
politico-military poker.Meanwhile, both
Koreas warily observe these developments from behind their respective national
barricades, while massive and nuclear-armed India observes from a distance,
with an eye towards an increasingly advantageous partnership with Japan.
It is becoming difficult to keep
pace with the daily reports of disturbing developments concerning Chinese military
and political ambition, aggressiveness, and expansionism.From the U.S. perspective, China's steady
movement towards the completion of a modern Blue Water Navy to challenge
the U.S. Seventh Fleet's maritime superiority in the East and South China Seas, and
ultimately the Western Pacific, is the probably most disturbing trend.In an especially significant breakthrough, the
construction of China's first domestically-produced aircraft carrier was recently commissioned, which
will result in a major expansion in the power projection of what is already the largest
navy in Asia. In all, China will reportedly add four aircraft carriers to its fleet as part of its current naval expansion.
Much ado about little? Sino-Japanese Dispute centers on the barren Senkaku Islands
Inasmuch as China has just surpassed
the U.S. as the world's largest trading nation, and most of its trade is
maritime, its desire to insure the security of its trade lanes with an improved
navy might seem understandable.But
other military and diplomatic activities strongly indicate that Chinese naval
expansion is more aggressive than defensive in nature – especially since it is
not responsive to any aggressive activities or threats from China's generally
docile East Asian neighbors or the U.S. Most recently, it is reported that
China is testing an advanced high-speed
hypersonic missile, apparently designed tobe carried on the back of an ICBM, from which it could be launched and
deliver a warhead at a reported ten-times the speed of sound.The projected hypersonic system appears designed to pierce and
circumvent U.S. missile defenses, although China demurely denies such a menacing objective.If the basic facts of the reports are true,
however, the hypersonic vehicle
represents yet another "great leap forward" -- to borrow a Maoist
adage -- in China’s seemingly relentless program to expand its military
capacities.
Apart from aggressive expansion of
its military and naval capacity, China is simultaneously engaged in fairly
radical threats and acts of territorial expansionism and irredentism. It has threatened in recent years to wrestle the
fishing-rich but uninhabited Senkaku Islands (which it calls Diaoyu) from Japan, whose claims to the islands date back to the Meiji era and which has exercised active sovereignty
over those islands since the U.S. handed over administrative control in 1971. Upping the ante, this past November China purported to establish an expanded East China Sea Air
Defense Identification Zone ("ADIZ") to encompass not only the Senkakus,
but other territorially sensitive sectors of the East China Sea that overlap the territorial claims of other nations.
If China were to seriously enforce
this expansionist ADIZ, it could generate a military crisis of the first order
with the U.S. and Japan, not to mention the Republic of Korea (whose
territorial sovereignty is also affronted by the ADIZ).Fortunately for all concerned, however, China
did not take any hostile responsive action when both the U.S. (with two B-52's)
and Japan sent noncompliant aircraft into the ADIZ to challenge the gambit.Nonetheless, China's willingness to engage in
politico-military brinksmanship in East Asia may not always produce the kind of
manageable modus vivendi that seems to have emerged thus far from the ADIZ declaration.
Just one ill-considered and egregious misstep in these sensitive areas could
trigger a highly combustible confrontation with the U.S. Seventh Fleet or the
JSDF.
China's provocative behavior in the
East China Sea seems particularly ill-timed in one key respect.It plays directly into the hands of Japanese
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's determination to expand Japan's military capacity
and to return Japan to a more "normal" role as an effective power player in
international affairs.An increasingly belligerent China, coupled
with the reckless bluster and unsettling gambits of the seemingly mad dictator
of North Korea, provides Mr. Abe with compelling external justification for his
efforts to expand the strength, capacity, and missions of the Japanese Self
Defense Force (JSDF) – the constitutional euphemism for the Japanese Armed
Forces.
Japan has come a long way from the
rigidly pacifist post-World War II policies imposed by the U.S. Occupation and
codified by Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution.Although Article 9 purports to"renounce war as a sovereign right of
the [Japanese] nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling
international disputes," and also forewears the maintenance of"land, sea, and air forces, as well as
other war potential," the JSDF now has by some estimates the fifth largest
military budget in the world.Moreover,
the JSDF's arsenal and capacity are expanding under Mr. Abe's nationalistic
leadership, with military spending having increased by 2.6% last year.This past November, moreover, the Japanese Diet passed
legislation establishing Japan's firstNational Security Council, modeled on that of the United States.The new arrangements are expected to
strengthen Prime Minister Abe's hand in directing and controlling a unified defense
policy. This is a far cry from the pacifist Japan that used to recoil in horror and vapors at the thought of nuclear-armed U.S. carriers merely stopping for port and liberty calls at Yokosuka.
Although Mr. Abe's more muscular
defense policies have provoked speculation that Japan may be on the brink of
repealing or amending Article 9, such speculation is fanciful, or at least quite premature.Powerful countervailing considerations of
domestic politics, foreign policy, and regional military stability militate
decisively (at least for now) against what would be widely regarded as a
drastic and destabilizing step.There is
little indication that the Japanese polity is supportive of what would
undoubtedly be a deeply controversial repeal campaign, and the potentially
severe external reactions on the part of the Chinese and the two Koreas provide
additional strong deterrence.
In any event, however, as long as
the JSDF's mission, forces, and capacities can be plausibly characterized as
defensive, Art. 9 should not prevent Japan from making pragmatic and
substantial improvements in the capacities of the ground, air, and naval
components of the JSDF.In short, Mr.
Abe and the LDP can be expected to continue substantial expansion and
strengthening of Japan's defense capacity and mission without engaging in
unnecessarily provocative rhetoric or political posturing.The more likely, and sounder, approach will
be to speak softly, but carry a bigger and more lethal defensive stick. Nonetheless, Japanese rhetorical and
political restraint may not suffice to sooth the regional tension and turmoil
generated by the increasingly belligerent attitude and actions of the PRC.Nor is the United States very likely to
provide a forceful counterweight to China's expansionist adventures in the East
and South China Seas.To the extent that
the Obama Administration has an East Asian policy at all, it seems to be one of
relative weakness, vagueness, and apathy. Still, the United States is not the
only power that could play the role of White Knight on the increasingly
dangerous chessboard of East Asia.India, a nuclear power (with an estimated 100 nuclear weapons) with both human and technological resources
comparable to those of China, appears to be moving towards an increasingly
friendly and supportive relationship with Japan.Both of these great Asian democracies face
territorial, economic, and political threats from China.As the Times
of India reported on January 7, Japan and India have initiated concrete
steps to strengthen their diplomatic and military cooperation, "with an
eye firmly on China."According to the Times, the measures
to be pursued by the two nations include joint combat exercises, military
exchanges, and cooperation in counter-terrorism, anti-piracy, and maritime
security.China is undoubtedly keeping a
nervous eye on this developing bilateral cooperation between the capable and resourceful democratic powers on its
flanks. The question remains whether Japan's
apparent determination to pursue a strengthened diplomatic and military posture
in East Asia, coupled with its enhanced ties with the Indian giant on China's
Western flank, will induce Beijing to adopt a more prudent and cautious policy
towards Japan and other neighbors in the East and South China Seas.Recent Chinese behavior, however, has not
been particularly encouraging in that respect.
If China instead decides to
intensify and expand its diplomatic and military belligerence in the region,
the East China Sea could supplant the Persian Gulf as the world's most
incendiary trouble spot.
When the ladies figure skating competition takes the ice
at the Sochi Winter Olympics on February 20, viewers around the world will be
treated to one of the most stirring and spectacular sporting summits in
decades.
Although
accomplished lady skaters from the U.S., Russia, Italy, and others will also be
competing, all eyes will focus on the latest dramatic clash between the two
world-renowned Ice Queens of East Asia -- Yuna Kim of the Republic of Korea and
Mao Asada of Japan.
Both
ladies are 23 years old, and both are precisely 5-feet 4-inches tall.They are not only the undisputed top lady
figure skaters in the world, but both are super celebrities in their
respectivecountries, with commercial
endorsements and pop stature that easily rival that of the top pro sports
superstars in the United States.
They
are especially the idols of teen and pre-teen girls in their countries, and
both are lady-like and likeable young women who serve as admirable role
models.Both have won an extensive list
ofinternational championships and both
are possessed of astonishing and unusual athletic skill and grace, not to
mention the winsome charm and beauty that makes them natural queens of the ice.
Miss
Kim is indeed widely known as Queen Yuna in South Korea, and with good
reason.Her national stature is such
that she has served as a host Ambassador for Visit Korea and was a key member
of the ROK delegation that successfully persuaded the International Olympic
Committee to award the 2018 Winter Olympics to Pyeongchang, ROK.Her celebrity and ladylike appeal make her a
natural international ambassador of goodwill (not to mention commerce and
tourism) for South Korea. Notwithstanding
Mao Asada's astonishing jumping and athletic skills, Miss Kim is almost
universally acknowledged as the world's greatest ladies figure skater – perhaps
even the greatest ever – and she will be the strong favorite when the ladies
take the ice at the spectacular Iceberg Skating Palace in Sochi.She won the gold medal at the 2010 Winter
Olympics in Vancouver with the astonishing total score of 228 points, far ahead
of Miss Asada's second place.She has
also won two World Championships, in 2009 and 2013.
Yuna Kim performs her layback Ina Bauer
While
Miss Asada is renowned for her spectacular – but risky -- triple axels, Miss
Kim's dominance is based upon a broad variety of flawless and graceful jumps,
spins, and maneuvers that she performs with almost inhuman poise and
consistency.Her jumps are performed at
a high speed that earns extra points, and she executes a variety of
triple-triple combinations that are usually unmatched by the competition.Her repertoire also includes the gorgeous
lay-back Ina Bauer that was the trademark maneuver of 2006 Olympic champion
Shizuka Arakawa, although not even Miss Kim can match the extreme contortions
of Miss Arakawa's gasp-inducing lay-backs.The end result of all this is that Miss Kim has achieved total scores
above 220 that her competitors thus far have been unable to approach, although Miss
Asada has scored as high as 207.
Some
doubts about Miss Kim's readiness for the Olympics were raised last September,
when she suffered an injury to her right foot.The injury resulted in her withdrawal from the 2013-14 Grand Prix
series, which was dominated primarily by Miss Asada in Kim's absence.
Ominously
for her competition, however, Miss Kim's stellar performance at the recent
Korean National championships left little doubt that she has fully recovered and
returned to superstar form.She easily
defeated a field of improving ROK competitors with a reported score of 227.86
points, according to the Korean Times.See
koreantimesus.com/?p=5083. Although that rather startlingly high reported score
may well have been inflated by a panel of friendly ROK judges, it nonetheless
sends an alarming signal that Miss Kim is in prime form for the Olympic
showdown.
Notwithstanding
Miss Kim's status as a formidable favorite in Sochi, it would be foolhardy to
dismiss the gold medal prospects of Mao Asada in light of her unearthly raw
talent and superlative accomplishments during her eight years in the
international skating arena.
Mao Asada landing one of her gorgeous triple jumps
Indeed,
Mao was a more remarkable youthful skating prodigy than Miss Kim, and, for
better or worse, much of her early fame and reputation was associated with her
amazing mastery of the triple axel. Named for Norwegian skater Axel Paulsen who
first performed the jump (a mere "single axel") wearing speed skates
in 1882, the triple axel is performed with a forward takeoff followed by three
and one-half aerial rotations.After the
legendary Midori Ito landed the first lady's triple axel in 1988, only four
additional women have performed the maneuver in competition (not including Miss
Kim, who apparently does not attempt it).The triple axel could be considered the gold standard of feats in ladies
figure skating, while the four-rotation quad – which has been performed in
competition by only one female, Miki Ando of Japan (Mao Asada has reportedly
landed quads in practice only) – could be considered its Holy Grail.
Mao
Asada performed her first triple axel in practice at the age of 12 and her first in competition at the
age of 14.By the age of 15, she had won
her first Grand Prix Final in 2005, and even finished ahead of the ultimate
2006 Olympic champion, Shizuka Arakawa, in Japan's National Championships (which
also served as Japan's Olympic trials that year).Although she was then considered by many to
be the leading lady skater in the world,
she was some three months too young to be eligible to compete in the 2006 Olympics
under IOC rules.Fellow countrywoman
Arakawa thus became the first Japanese lady to win the figure skating gold
medal with her memorably gorgeous performance to Puccini's Tarandot before an enthralled audience in Turin, Italy, and on
worldwide television (see video insert below).
In
the ensuing years, Mao's accomplishments have been extraordinary, exceeded only
by those of the even more extraordinary Miss Kim.Miss Asada has won two world championships,
four Grand Prix Final championships, and six Japanese National championships.In the 2010 Winter Olympics, she performed a
feat of amazing virtuosity, landing three triple axels in an
unprecedented performance for a single competition.Even with that, she was far out-pointed by
Miss Kim's world record score of 228 and had to settle for the silver medal.
In
the current 2013-14 Grand Prix season, Miss Asada won both of her assigned
events (Skate America with 204.55 points and NHK with 207.59), and went on to
win the Grand Prix Final for the fourth time.In her final official pre-Olympic performance, however, she finished a very
disappointing third in the Japanese National championships, where she was edged
out by Akiko Suzuki and Kanako Murakami, who will be her Olympic teammates at
Sochi.
Miss
Asada's occasional setbacks on the ice are commonly attributed to
under-rotating her triple jumps, especially the axel, and for other arcane
technical landing errors that are a mystery to non-experts like this writer.Knowledgeable observers, however, attribute
some of her difficulties in this area to increasingly strict new judging
criteria that are especially problematic for a daring jumper like Miss
Asada.This factor, and the relentless
pressure of years of competition at the very highest levels, seem to have
somewhat undercut the insouciant and joyful style that was the charming
hallmark of Mao's performances as a younger prodigy.While the youthful teenage Mao seemed to
smile and almost prance her way through her joyful performances – she even
carried a teddy bear during part of one competition -- she has sometimes seemed
more grim and tentative in the high-pressure meets of more recent years.This is certainly understandable, however,
when one is constantly measured against so imposing and formidable a rival as
Yuna Kim.
Shizuka Arakawa's gold medal artistry at Turin in 2006 sets a high standard for Mao Asada to pursue at Sochi this year.
As
if the stakes in the forthcoming competition between these two Ice Queens were
not sufficiently high, the intensity is exacerbated to some degree by the
strained state of relations between their respective countries.Diplomatic efforts to ease tensions between
Japan and the ROK have been frustrated by, among other things, a lingering
territorial dispute over two volcanic islands and continuing bitterness over
what South Korea considers to be inadequate expression of Japanese remorse over
the Japanese Army's abuse of young Korean girls known as "comfort
women" during World War II.Although the skating fans of both nations are sufficiently knowledgeable
and open-minded to appreciate and admire the accomplishments of both Miss Kim
and Miss Asada, it is inescapable that the broader enmities between the two
great East Asian democracies tend to infect their competition on the ice with
an extra element of intensity.So on top
of everything else, the patriotic hopes and emotions of the nations of Japan
and the Republic of Korea will be at maximum focus when Yuna and Mao take the
ice at Sochi.
Anyone
who has stood alone at the line to attempt a critical technical foul shot before
a packed arena of fans in the closing seconds of a championship basketball
game; anyone who has attempted a game-deciding field goal in a football playoff
game; or anyone who has stood above a 12-foot put on the 18th green
with the outcome of an important golf tournament on the line – all who have
faced those circumstances or others like them know the overwhelming pressure
and tension that is placed upon the solitary athlete at such crucial
competitive moments.
Multiply
that feeling five-fold to approximate the pressure that will surround Mao Asada
when she glides into the takeoff of her triple axel before hundreds of millions
of world-wide television viewers, and a suspenseful Japanese nation, in the
free-skate finals at Sochi.Her Olympic
fate will likely hang on the knife-like edge of a skater's blade when she
descends, hopefully with controlled grace, upon the cold blue ice of the
Iceberg Skating Palace.And if she lands
it perfectly, and proceeds to nail the rest of her program, an atmosphere of similarly
intense pressure will fall upon Yuna Kim.
It
should be a competition worthy of the ages.It is only a shame that both of these excellent ladies cannot emerge
from Sochi with Olympic Gold.
In the New Year, Splashing Rocks' eyes turn towards East
Asia, where a cluster of entirely unrelated phenomena, involving the near future and
the recent past, attract our scrutiny and interest.
As a welcome diversion from the combative or controversial
policy issues we often confront, we begin with a renewed examination of the peculiar
yet abiding influence of SR's favorite
musical artists, the Carpenters, on the musical cultures of Japan, China, and
other East Asian countries. In ensuing
posts we will explore the forthcoming high-tension Battle of the East Asian Ice
Queens --Yuna Kim of South Korea and Mao Asada of Japan -- in the Sochi Olympics; and then the increasingly ominous friction between China and Japan in the more menacing
arena of potential military confrontation.
*
* * *
Splashing Rocks
has previously examined the remarkably persistent appeal of the music of the
Carpenters, and the near mythical status of the late Karen Carpenter, in Japan,
China, and other countries of East Asia.
See, e.g., "Opening
Splash: East Asia and the
Carpenters," at splashingrocks.blogspot.com. While a wide range of Carpenters recordings
have enjoyed success in these countries, two songs in particular have achieved such
widespread and longstanding popularity in East Asia that they have risen to the
status of transnational pop classics.
Both of them were written by the adroit composing team of Richard
Carpenter (music) and John Bettis (lyrics), and both of course featured the
flawless contralto vocals of Karen Carpenter.
The first of these perennial East Asian favorites is the international
anthem of pop music nostalgia, "Yesterday Once More" (YOM). Although YOM was a mega-hit in the U.S. when
first released in 1973 – it reached No. 1 on 3 of the 4 relevant pop charts at
that time, and easily reached Gold Record certification – it has not enjoyed
the longstanding popularity of a classic in the U.S. market. While that may be attributable in part to the
systemic bias of the American rock/pop music establishment against anything
that could be considered middle-of-the-road, wholesome, or family friendly, it
may also reflect the fact that YOM ranks well behind numerous other Carpenters
classics (e.g., "Superstar," "For All We Know," "Good-bye
to Love," "Close to You," etc.) in terms of sheer musical depth
and quality.
Record Jacket of the Japanese version of Yesterday Once More
Regardless, YOM went on to achieve unparalleled success
and popularity in Japan, China, and other Asian countries from its release in
1973 and continuing well after Karen Carpenter's death in 1983, and up to the
present.It quickly reached No. 1 on the
charts in Hong Kong, Singapore, and Malaysia in 1974, and the album on which it
was the featured "bookend" song, Now and Then, reached No. 1 on the Japanese album chart (the YOM single also held No. 2 in Japan for several months). As documented on this blog and many others, YOM achieved such
popularity and ubiquity in post-Maoist China that Western hipsters traveling there were completely mystified by its cult-like popularity in
Beijing, Shanghai, Hong Kong, and in even more remote corners of the PRC.A nationwide poll taken by the popular Chinese radio station
"China Drive" in 2007 showed that YOM was the first English language
song heard by well over 50% of the respondents.As evidenced by countless reports, articles, and Internet postings out
of China, there is little doubt that YOM was the most popular and widely played
Western song in China from its first openings to foreign music in the mid-1980's until the current era of digitally accessible music on a global scale.
Karen Carpenter memorably sings Yesterday Once More at Tokyo's Budokan in 1974
Considering YOM's prolonged primacy among popular songs
in the world's most populous (1.4 million people) country; the
range and duration (at least 40 years) of its popularity not only in China, but in
other populous East Asian countries like Japan, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, the
Philippines, and the Republic of Korea; and the number and striking diversity
of the countries in which it reached No. 1 (U.S., Canada, Hong Kong, Singapore,
Malaysia, Venezuela, Belgium, and Israel, among others) or No. 2 (Japan and UK)
on the national charts; taking all this
into account, a credible case could be made that more persons have heard "Yesterday
Once More" than any pop song in history, at least in the pre-digital
age (the "viral" spread of music via the Internet today renders
comparisons between the two eras inapposite, as today's conditions permit a
degree of access and distribution far beyond that allowed in the earlier era,
wholly without regard to the quality of the music or of the listeners'
approval).
The second Carpenters song to achieve cult-like status in East Asia (essentially Japan in this case) is the 1976 recording,
"I Need to Be in Love."
Although the recording reached No. 1 on the U.S. Billboard Adult
Contemporary chart (then called the Easy Listening chart), it peaked at only
No. 25 on the more inclusive Billboard Hot 100.
The Carpenters' U.S. popularity – and their personal health – had been
on the decline by 1976, and the song was soon forgotten in America by all but
dedicated Carpenters fans.
Interestingly, however, it was reportedly Karen Carpenter's personal
favorite of all the duo's recordings, probably because of its deeply personal
associations and lyrics, including the poignant and memorable line, "I'm
wide awake at 4 A.M., without a friend in sight."
Like "Yesterday Once More," however, "I
Need to be in Love" (INTBIL for brevity) enjoyed a second and much more significant
surge of popularity overseas years later.
The Japanese Maritime Self Defense Force Band Plays Seishun no Kagayaki in Yokosuka
In 1995, a teen-oriented television series named
"Miseinen" (roughly translated as "Under Age" or
"Beginners") was a major hit in Japan. Seizing on the long-time popularity of
Carpenters music in Japan, the show's producers utilized three Carpenters'
songs for the themes and soundtrack of the series: "Top of the World,"
"Desperado, " and "I Need to be in Love." As documented in my earlier posts, this led
to an enormous resurgence of the Carpenters' popularity in Japan. A CD single with "Top of the World"
on one side and INTBIL on the other reached No. 5 on Japan's Oricon all-pop
chart and was certified as a quadruple platinum record; and a repackaged
compilation of the "22 Greatest Hits of the Carpenters" (with INTBIL
as the lead-off song) became what was then the largest selling album by non-Japanese artists
in Japanese history, with over 3 million in sales. Eventually, and rather oddly to Western
perception, the song came to be known in Japan as "Seishun no
Kagayaki," roughly translated as something like, "The Glow of
Youth." The bizarre re-titling is
likely attributable to the song's association with the teen-oriented Miseinen television themes, but, for whatever reason,
it has stuck.
Although the song's enormous success in Japanese record
and album sales 20 years after its original release was significant in itself, it
was the enormous fondness for the song on the part of Japanese
musicians (both professional and amateur) that has made Seishun no Kagayaki (SNK, for short) a genuine cross-cultural
phenomenon.
A cursory search on YouTube, using either "I Need to
be in Love" or the Japanese characters for Seishun no Kagayaki, will reveal that literally thousands
of videos of this 38-year-old American song have been posted. The vast majority of these videos record
instrumental performances of the song by Japanese orchestras, groups, or
individuals. And new video recordings of
the song by Japanese posters appear almost daily.
A sax-led rendition of SNK by the Kashiwa Brass, circa 2010
The scope of this cultural phenomenon is demonstrated by
the incredible variety of Japanese musicians who have performed and recorded the
song. The plethora of video recordings
of SNK include formal recitals by the official bands of both the Japanese Maritime Self
Defense Force and the Japanese Air Self Defense Force; vocal renditions by
popular Japanese songstresses like Keiko Toge and Rei Fu; studio recordings by
sophisticated combos like the quartet of elegant Japanese lady instrumentalists
known as Vanilla Mood; and, my
personal favorite, jazz-club style performances by the likes of a mini-skirted lady saxophonist wearing a Blues Brother-style chapeau, somewhere in the depths of the Shinjuku musical underground. And the song
has been video-recorded by Japanese professional and amateur instrumentalists
on almost every instrument imaginable:
piano, organ, guitar, violin, cello, flute, and especially all varieties of the
saxophone.
The remarkable oddity is that so many thousands of Japanese
musicians and singers have been (and continue to be) inspired to perform and
record what was a relatively minor hit by the Carpenters in the U.S. nearly 40
years ago. A combination of factors
likely explains this phenomenon: the near-mythical
stature of Karen Carpenter and the Carpenters in Japan's pop music culture; the popularity of Miseinen and its iconic musical score; the mellifluous and
user-friendly quality of the song's musical composition; and the Japanese
people's exceptional appreciation of beautiful musical compositions, coupled
with the exceptionally large number of Japanese who are trained and talented in
all varieties of instrumental music.
Whatever the reason, it appears that somewhere in Japan someone
is always playing or singing Seishun no
Kagayaki – just as somewhere in China, someone is always listening to
"Yesterday Once More" on the radio, in a karaoke bar, or in a hotel
lobby.
Who would think that two songs that originated in the
1970's with three earnest American suburban kids in Downey, California -- Richard and Karen Carpenter and John Bettis – would
endure as beloved classics in the musical
cultures of Japan and China some 40 years later, and likely for decades yet to
come?
Somewhere up there, Karen must be
smiling like she did in 1970.
In 1964, California surfer-boy troubadors Jan and Dean
released their hit recording, "The Little Old Lady from Pasadena,"
which hit No. 3 on the Billboard Hot 100 and became a part of American pop
folklore.The catchy song featured a
hot-rodding old lady in tennis shoes, whose NASCAR-style driving was so
aggressive that she became known as "the terror of Colorado
Boulevard" – the iconic central avenue of Pasadena, which annually hosts
the perennially popular Tournament of Roses Parade.
Fast
forward to New Years Day 2014, and consider the dark and depressing state to
which Colorado Boulevard, the City of Pasadena, the State of California, and,
indeed, the U.S. have fallen.
The
new year has revealed an entirely new terror of Colorado Boulevard, and it has
nothing to do with aggressive drivers, whether superannuated or otherwise.
No,
we now learn that the Tournament of Roses Parade, long renowned for its
universal appeal to families and enthusiastic New Years Day celebrants of all
ages, has been hijacked and corrupted by the emboldened forces of the
homosexual advocacy movement (HAM).Parade officials have announced that the parade will include a same-sex
"marriage" (SSM) float, on which a purported homosexual marriage of
two men will be performed live during the parade.The two men, one bearded and one bald, have
appeared on TV interviews, and they do not make a pretty sight.
Caligula approves the Rose Parade's Same Sex Marriage Float
It
is not enough that the relentlessly obnoxious forces of the homosexual movement
have corrupted and undermined such heretofore wholesome and morally upstanding
institutions as the Girl Scouts and the Boy Scouts.
It
is not enough that it has conspired with its political allies in the Democratic
Party and the White House to infiltrate the very Armed Forces of the United
States, and has cowed the spineless General Staff of the services into not only
accepting, but now embracing, what it condemned and opposed only a few years
ago – the subversion of unit cohesion and solidarity through the introduction
of avowed sodomites into the barracks and naval bunking compartments.
And
it is not enough that forces of aggressive homosexual advocacy have now
subverted and degraded the very bedrock institution of modern human
civilization – the marriage of one woman and one man for the procreation of
children and the formation of enduring families.The gay rights movement's relentless campaign
for the oxymoron of same-sex marriage -- aided and abetted by the Obama-led
Democrat Party and the liberal judiciary, and acquiesced in by passive and
conformist masses of the citizenry – seeks to equate the romantic matrimonial ideal
of "white lace and promises" with the grotesque, smirking parody of
black leather and licentiousness.
Not
content with American society's astonishingly rapid acceptance of what that
same America would have almost unanimously dismissed as utter lunacy only a
generation ago, the HAM has become so smug in its successes that it now feels
comfortable in engaging in deliberate public provocation of the remnant of
society that is still capable of taking offense at the patently offensive.
And,
make no mistake, the performance of a purported marriage of two men on a float
in the Tournament of Roses Parade is a massive and deliberate provocation and
affront to the millions of traditional-values families watching the parade in
person or on TV.That parade (and others
like it) is understandably viewed as a family-friendly spectacle where parents
and children can enjoy spectacularly beautiful rose-laden floats, spirited
college and high school marching bands, and smiling beauty queens without the
depressing distraction of the ugly realities of the darker side of modern
life.But the same-sex marriage float
obnoxiously interjects an offensive element of controversy, confrontation, and
effrontery that is the very antithesis of what the parade represents.
Further,
the same-sex marriage float introduces something even more sinister and
subversive into the once wholesome atmosphere of the Tournament of Roses
Parade.There are undoubtedly many
parade participants, in high school bands or sponsors or creators of various
floats, who consider the same-sex marriage float offensive and
objectionable.Yet these people have
devoted enormous amounts of time, effort, and expense towards their
participation, and many will have traveled thousands of miles for what may
amount to the most exciting event of the year for them.Given these realities, it is probable that
even those participants who object to the SSM float will suppress their
objections and enjoy their big day in the parade notwithstanding its subversion
by the homosexual activists.By their
participation in a parade that very visibly honors and glorifies homosexual
marriage, however, people who actually object to SSM are placed in the position
of appearing to approve and endorse it.They
are subtly commandeered as props, providing unwitting support to the SSM
movement.However unfair it may seem, it
is difficult to maintain that you object to a movement when you have marched in
step with it on national television.
Sadly,
most of American society has descended to a state of such flaccid moral
indifference that not even the most offensive public degeneracies can provoke
public outrage.Whether it is Miley
Cyrus simulating perverted sexual contortions on a TV awards show or two men
engaging in a grotesque parody of marriage on a float in the Tournament of
Roses Parade, the great mass of Americans either shrug in amused indifference
or profess to a pseudo-sophisticated annoyance at those who are so puritanical
to express offense.Consequently, it is not
surprising -- although deeply disappointing -- that one upstanding woman's
effort to organize a boycott of the SSM-infested Parade on Facebook has drawn
only indifferent support (only 7,571 "likes," including mine, as of
New Years Eve, a paltry number by contemporary digital media standards).
So
on New Years Day 2014, it appears that thousands of Rose Bowl Parade
participants, and many millions of parade viewers, will fall in lockstep in the
mindless march towards societal degeneracy that is epitomized by the festive
celebration of the oxymoron of same-sex marriage.The non-conformists who hark to the
principled beat of a different drummer will have no parade they can march in
this year.