It has become almost trite
to quote Benjamin Franklin's famous response to the lady who asked him what
kind of government the Constitutional Convention had established in 1787, but
it has never been more relevant than it is now.
Mr. Franklin tersely responded, "A republic, madam – if you can
keep it."
Judging by the feckless response to Obama's
recent seizure of the legislative power by nullifying the
nation's immigration laws, much of America has meekly submitted to the effective dissolution of our republican form of government.
As Franklin prophetically feared over two centuries ago, we have failed
to "keep" our constitutional republic.
This is not defeatist hyperbole. It is harsh political and cultural reality –
at least in the present sorry epoch of our history.
A poll conducted by Quinnipiac University indicates that 45% of Americans actually support Obama's imperious grant of
amnesty to millions of illegal aliens who he knows will support him and his
degenerate party at the polls (48% opposed the action according to the
poll). In other words, nearly half of
Americans apparently endorse the abandonment of a representative and responsive
democratic republic in favor of quasi-dictatorship by an arrogant, racially
biased leftist.
This is the depth to which the unworthy heirs of
Washington, Franklin, and Jefferson have descended under Obama's Caligulan
misrule.
The contemporary failure of the republican ideal does not
lie in some flaw in the constitutional structure the Framers passed down to
us. There are ample remedies in the
Constitution – including Congress's powers to control the purse and to impeach
the President, and the courts' extensive powers of judicial review – to override
Obama's imposition of government by executive decree. There are also indirect supplemental
remedies, such as the Republican Senate's ability to block any and all of
Obama's executive and judicial nominations when the next Congress convenes in
January.
Sadly, however, most of those who exercise the
legislative and judicial powers in America today either lack the will and
courage to wield those powers against the President, or actually support and
endorse Obama's seizure of unconstitutional powers. The few righteous voices in the congressional
wilderness who are willing to invoke
the necessary potent remedies, such as the admirable Texas conservative,
Senator Ted Cruz, have thus far been unable to rally sufficient support to
mount a credible counter-attack.
With appalling audacity, Obama has effectively
decreed that the laws governing and restricting immigration into the United States have
no meaning, force, or consequences; that the millions of aliens from the South who
have violated our laws, invaded our nation, and brazenly seized our public
resources are not only exempted from deportation or any other adverse
consequence for their transgressions, but are to be rewarded with government benefits and largesse; and that the law-abiding
Americans who have constantly supported
and defended this country must bear the cost and imposition of this lawless
invasion across our national borders.
This must be marked:
Not only are Obama's alien preference decrees blatantly and subversively
unconstitutional because they usurp power that belongs to Congress alone under
Art. I of the Constitution; but they are infused with scorn for all
traditional Americans who rightfully oppose them, and who expressed that
opposition in nationwide elections less
than one month ago.
The ink is barely dry on the November election returns registering
the Nation's comprehensive rejection of Obama's main policies -- emphatically
including his well-known intent to issue an executive decree legalizing the
status of some five million illegal aliens.
In an unambiguous vote of "no confidence," the voters ousted
the Democrats from control of the U.S. Senate and reduced their representation
in the House of Representatives to the lowest level in over 80 years. In a parliamentary system of government,
Obama would have been rendered politically impotent and forced to call for new
elections.
Although ours is not a parliamentary system like Japan's
or the UK's, our constitutional and political structures contemplate that any responsible
President would recognize the sentiment expressed in the election landslide by
adjusting his policies – and his attitude – in response to the voters'
expressed preferences. Not so Obama, who
is incurably egotistical and scornfully indifferent to the wishes of all but
those of his own race (that is, the black half of it) or those of his leftist
ideology. Far from conceding any ground
to the voters or the representatives they had just elected, Obama has brazenly
reaffirmed his most unpopular policies and programs.
The Great Virginian, Thomas Jefferson, once explained "Dependence
begets subservience and venality, suffocates the germ of virtue, and prepares
fit tools for the designs of ambition."
The "subservience and venality" lamented by Mr.
Jefferson not only permeates a substantial portion of today's American populace
(as shown by the nearly 50% who apparently approve Obama's amnesty decree), but
sadly is on full display among the leadership of the Republican majority that
was just elected to forcefully oppose Obama -- rather than to appease him. Neither Senate Majority Leader Mitch
McConnell nor House Speaker John Boehner has displayed the forceful anger and
determination that is required to counter Obama's unconstitutional edicts. They both appear unwilling to adopt the hard
measures that would provide the minimum response to Obama's arrogant
usurpations.
But the Nation cannot afford such prevarication and timidity
in the face of Obama's dangerous misrule.
McConnell and Boehner should announce that Congress will exercise its
power over appropriations to deny funding for any government resources,
personnel, or contracts that are needed to implement the lawless amnesty
decree.
Yet an almost paranoid
fear of adverse media reaction to the misnamed "government
shutdown" that might follow from such targeted defunding deters the
Republican leadership from taking the minimal necessary action. That leadership seems oblivious to the fact that congressional
Republicans have just achieved a massive election victory in defiance of
arguments that last year's so-called shutdown crisis would doom them to defeat.
Absent forceful congressional counter-measures such as a sweeping
denial of funding for any aspect of the amnesty program, the collapse of
constitutional governance initiated by Obama's lawless decrees will only
accelerate.
Most critics of Obama's amnesty decree have focused on
how it violates the constitutional separation of powers, by arrogating to the
President the legislative power over immigration. While this is true enough and disastrous
enough, the decree goes beyond that and violates what may be the most
fundamental and elemental provision of the Constitution: the Guarantee Clause, found in Art. IV, sec.
4 of the Constitution, which provides in part:
"The United States shall guarantee to every State in
the Union a Republican Form of Government, and
shall protect each of them against Invasion."
In one fell swoop, Obama's amnesty decree
violates both of the quoted mandates of
the Guarantee Clause. A Republican Form
of Government is one in which power is held by the people and their elected
representatives, yet Obama's actions on alien amnesty, illegal recess
appointments, and unilateral revision of laws like the Welfare Reform Act
deprive all the States of the effective legislative representation that is the essence
of a Republic. And far from protecting
the States against the alien invasion from Mexico and Central America, Obama
has indisputably encouraged and facilitated that invasion by repeatedly
rewarding and protecting the invaders.
Benjamin Franklin warned us over two centuries ago that the
Republic bequeathed to us by the genius, blood, and bravery of our Founding
Fathers would not be easily maintained.
Unless more Americans and their representatives gather their resolve to
resist Obama's ominous encroachments , the Guarantee Clause and the rest of the
Constitution will soon be reduced to an empty and ineffectual parchment.
No comments:
Post a Comment